Even bad sources have good uses
04/13/2022
My writing on China has slowed to a crawl because I've been so busy reading new books. Some are excellent, while others have been questionable.
The situation is not quite as bad as researching the Spanish Civil War, where a uniform scholarly bias exists that has only recently been challenged.
With China, the situation is more complex. The crimes of Communism are undeniable, which makes it difficult to shower the Peoples' Republic with the same sort of soft-focus fan service rendered to the Second Spanish Republic.
The language barrier is also difficult, particularly with two translation schemes. What this does is make it much easier for modern pro-CCP scholars to obscure unpleasant facts since the English renderings of most of the place-names have been changed.
Still, I'm reaching a point where I'm getting quite good at detecting the presence of revisionist propaganda, which is particularly important as my account has now reached the modern era.
Just as the bombing of Guernica has served as a useful litmus test on a source's reliability regarding the Spanish Civil War, the treatment of China's brutal imperialist history has provided a useful guide to gauging a source's reliability in other areas.
As a sidenote, I still don't have a title. I'm sure one will come to me...eventually.
Comments